Inside This Special Report:
- World Health Organisation Predicts Escalation in Diabetes, Cancer, Heart Disease and Dementia Rates Over The Next 15 Years. . . Find out what you can do to protect yourself and your family
- The ‘Medical Insiders’ Who Are Privately Admitting That We’ve Lost The Battle Against ‘Superbugs’. . .They’ve known about it for years, but didn’t bother to tell us!
- 82,724 Patients Killed By Prescription Drugs, According To Official Figures . . . Despite Following Doctors Orders! Read on to discover how a secret, sleazy practice is endangering hundreds of thousands of lives each year
- Whistle-Blowers Risk Professional SuicideTo Reveal How Drug Companies Withhold Information On Drug Safety. . . What you need to know to avoid becoming a victim of the next big drug scandal
- Drug Companies And The ‘Health Police’ Collude To Suppress Your Right To Know About Natural Medicines. . . Here’s what you can do to preserve your freedom to choose safer alternatives to prescription drugs
Special Investigation by Andrew Miller, Publisher of
the Journal of Natural Health Solutions: London.
On Friday, September 27th 2002, behind the closed doors of the 42nd Inter-Science Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy in San Diego, USA, a hushed international assembly of top doctors, bacteriologists and government officials finally heard the news they’d been dreading…
Scientists from the Center For Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Georgia had just confirmed their worst fears by reporting the first ever case of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (VRSA) infection.
The ‘unthinkable’ had finally happened.
A ‘super’ strain of the bacteria staphylococcus aureus had finally found a way to become resistant to medicine’s ‘big gun’ antibiotic, vancomycin — our last line of defence against superbugs. (Source: Staphylococcus aureus resistant to vancomycin – United States, 2002. MMWR. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;51:565-567)
In simple language, what this meant for you and me — and for the population of the planet — was that we had just LOST the battle against one of the most virulent superbugs known to mankind.
Antibiotics have always been considered an impregnable defence against staphylococcus aureus ever since they were first introduced in the 1930s and 1940s.
Indeed, up until the 1990s most antibiotics had done their job well against bacterial infection – so well in fact that doctors dolled out antibiotics like candy to treat every trivial ailment around… a normal cold, a small cut or graze, or a minor inflammation or infection.
However, by overprescribing antibiotics, doctors had unwittingly allowed bacteria to build up resistance to antibiotics.
One by one, antibiotics began to lose their effectiveness, until they reached the last line of defence… vancomycin.
Not surprisingly, this devastating news from the San Diego conference was hushed up by the US government for fear that it would cause a national panic.
But as the years passed, it soon became clear to medical insiders that the situation was becoming worse and worse . . .
Fast forward nearly 10 years to Friday, March 16th 2012 . . . Margaret Chan, Director General of the World Health Organisation (WHO) famously predicts ‘the end of modern medicine’ as the WHO finally admits that antibiotics have been so over-used that they’re now almost completely useless against ‘super strains’ of bacterial infection.
The result of this, she warns, could be that routine operations become impossible to carry out and minor cuts and grazes become potentially life-threatening.
Now, in terms of apocalyptic scenarios, this is right up there with Armageddon!
A ‘catastrophic national emergency’
Fast forward again to the present day… on Thursday, 24th January 2013, Dame Sally Davies, the UK’s Chief Medical Officer, warns members of the British parliament that:
“…the rise in antibiotic-resistant diseases could trigger a national emergency comparable to a catastrophic terrorist attack, pandemic flu or major coastal flooding.”
She goes on to say that the threat from infections which are resistant to frontline antibiotics is so serious that the issue should be added to the government’s national risk register of civil emergencies.
Wow! When you hear high officials using words like “the end of modern medicine” and “catastrophic national emergency”, then you can be pretty sure that something’s going drastically wrong with our system of healthcare…
So, what’s prompted these high officials to come out with these stark warnings?
And why now…?
Hello, my name is Andrew Miller, I’m the Publisher of The Journal of Natural Health Solutions in London.
We’ve been reporting on health and medicine for over 15 years and we now have more than 120,000 subscribers worldwide who receive our regular health advisory service.
And during those 15 years, one thing has stood out more than anything else… that prescription medicines are failing to deliver freedom from illness and disease.
Every day we receive dozens of letters, emails and posts on our websites asking for help from people whose lives have been ruined by a prescription drug or treatment which has damaged them.
And they’re all saying the same thing: If only I’d known sooner…
It was this sense of anger and frustration that people just aren’t being told the truth about the drugs we all take on a daily basis that first drove us to lift the lid on the sleazy practices of the pharmaceutical industry…
And as we delved deeper, we uncovered deceit, corruption and false claims on a shockingly grand scale which is costing hundreds of thousands of lives every year…
The Most Serious Situation There’s Ever Been
For the last 80 years, antibiotics have been medicine’s biggest success story… which is more than can be said for most of the other 2,500 most commonly prescribed drugs you’re likely to be given by your doctor.
But now the pipeline of new antibiotics is drying up...
Very few — if any — new antibiotics have been developed over the last 30 years, with the result that just for C. difficile infection, there are now an estimated 3 million cases every year in the US alone — a figure which has doubled over the last 10 years.
The reason for this is that drug companies have been cutting back on research & development of antibiotics because they don’t make enough profit from them...
Instead they’ve put all their efforts into developing more lucrative ‘blockbuster’ drugs for heart disease, cancer, diabetes and cholesterol.
You see, the problem with antibiotics is that they’ve always been too effective — normally curing people within a couple of weeks.
But, drug companies don’t make any money by curing people — they only make money by keeping people sick.
And the more people who are alive but chronically sick, then the more money they can make by selling expensive medications that simply ‘manage’ conditions like heart disease, diabetes and cancer over a person’s lifetime instead of curing them.
Besides, antibiotic resistant bacteria are just too darned smart — every time drug companies come up with a new antibiotic, the bacteria just outsmarts it . . . It’s just too much like hard work for no reward!
So, now this Golden Age of Antibiotics is over, what comes next?
…There must be other drugs being developed that will take the place of antibiotics…?
…What about all the new drugs and vaccines that we read about in the papers every day?
…Surely, they’ll protect us from disease and suffering, won’t they?
…After all … medicine has got disease pretty much under control, hasn’t it?
…Surely we’ve never been healthier . . . aren’t we all living longer now than we ever did?
Well, the authorities certainly want us to believe that drugs are keeping us healthy and helping us live longer.
But, I’m afraid this couldn’t be further from the truth.
And, although statistics show that we are living longer, this has more to do with better sanitation, better standards of hygiene, and a drastic reduction in infant mortality rates – all of which plagued our society from the early 1900s…
…and very little to do with pharmaceutical drugs.
Quite simply, the drugs that we have today either don’t work, or else they’re too dangerous to take because of their damaging side effects.
And this is backed up by official figures that show…
We may be living longer, but we’re all living sicker
If modern medicine really had disease under control, then what I’m about to tell you wouldn’t be happening…
- Cancer is set to claim TWICE as many lives by 2030 than it does today, according to official figures from the International Agency For Cancer Research…
- Your odds of suffering a devastating heart attack or stroke have shortened to GREATER THAN 1-in-3, according to the British Heart Foundation…
- Diabetes now affects over 220 million people globally and the consequences of high blood sugar kill 3.4 million every year – a figure which is set to DOUBLE over the next fifteen years… (Source: World Health Organisation)
- By 2030, a new case of dementia will be diagnosed every FOUR SECONDS, according to the World Health Organisation…
Does this sound to you like we’re winning the war on disease and suffering?
Do you want to spend 9.8 years of your
life without the use of your legs?
It seems like a ridiculous question.
But, according to latest official figures, that’s exactly what lies in store for the average 20-year old woman today.
Recent research published in the Journal of Gerontology found that, although we’re all living longer, those extra years are likely to be ones filled with more pain, more suffering and loss of independence…
Their researchers discovered that in just eight short years between 1998 to 2006:
- the prevalence of cardiovascular disease INCREASED among older men
- Both older men and women showed an INCREASED prevalence of cancer
- Diabetes INCREASED significantly among ALL adult age groups over age 30
- The proportion of the population with MULTIPLE DISEASES also INCREASED
The researchers also found that the period of life we spend with serious disease or loss of functional mobility has increased in the last few decades.
What this means is that a 20-year-old today can expect to live one LESS healthy year over his or her life span than a 20-year-old a decade ago.
That’s a shocking discovery
But that isn’t where it ends…
A male who is 20 years old today can expect to spend 5.8 years over the rest of his life without basic mobility… compared to only 3.8 years a decade ago.
That’s an additional two years’ of life where you’re unable to walk up ten steps or walk a quarter of a mile.
For a female 20-year-old today, it’s even worse… she can expect a misery-filled 9.8 years without mobility, compared to 7.3 years a decade ago.
So, far from leading longer healthier lives, we’re all getting sicker much younger than ever before in our history.
And we’re becoming dependent on medication much, much earlier in life than ever before…
Of course, that’s music to the ears of the pharmaceutical industry.
The more people who are alive but chronically sick, then the more money they can make by selling expensive medications.
And by the time you reach 50, it’s almost certain that you’ll be taking a cocktail of medications every day for a variety of illnesses, conditions and preventions.
So, Instead of sailing effortlessly into old age, in full possession of your faculties and bodily functions…
…with a razor-sharp mind and the vitality of someone half your age, retaining your independence and your zest for life…
…the likelihood is that you – like so many others do – will merely spiral into long-term decline, chronic illness and medicine-dependency… your quality of life dwindling day by pitiful day as you become an ever bigger burden on your family…
Is this how you want to spend your later years… or do you want to do something about it now?
Medicine is teetering on the brink of collapse
If you still have faith that medicine has the answers to keeping us healthy and curing chronic illnesses like heart disease, diabetes, cancer and dementia, then I’ve got more bad news for you, I’m afraid. . .
Official sources show that deaths from pharmaceutical drugs have escalated over the last 10 years.
According to the US government’s Centre for Disease Control (CDC), pharmaceutical drugs killed nearly 38,000 Americans in 2009.
The FDA’s own figures suggest a worsening picture…
Their figures for 2010 reported 471,291 ‘serious patient outcomes’ from FDA-approved drugs.
This included 82,724 deaths — a figure that has doubled in just 4 years. (Source: US Department of Health and Human Services, March 31, 2010)
And according to another US government agency – DAWN (the Drug Abuse Warning Network) – 2.3 million patients per year need emergency hospital treatment following an adverse reaction to their medication…
… and that’s despite following the correct dosage as prescribed by their doctor.
Prescription drugs are now the fourth leading cause of death in the US behind cancer heart disease and strokes, and kill more people every year than road traffic accidents (36,000).
So how have we arrived at a situation where the drugs that are meant to be curing disease and saving lives have become one of the biggest killers on the planet?
Ever since the pharmaceutical industry first began to exert its stranglehold over our system of healthcare back in the 1920s and 1930s, it has boasted…
…that the drugs it produces are based on solid scientific evidence…
…and that they undergo rigorous testing to prove their effectiveness
But, we’re beginning to discover that these claims just don’t hold water, especially when you realise that…
Nearly 90 per cent of drugs
and treatments DON’T work
Mainstream medicine has always enjoyed a powerful and privileged position as one of the bedrock sciences on which our whole society depends.
It’s granted special dispensation under the law.
Doctors and medical scientists are rarely challenged – we always accept what they tell us because their word is considered beyond question.
Executives from pharmaceutical companies sit on the boards of regulators, broadcasters and publishers of scientific journals and control what you can and can’t be told about treatments and remedies.
They fix it so that internet search engines like Google, Bing and the rest fall into line – under threat of legal and commercial sanctions – so that the search results you get when searching for a solution to your health problem are likely to belong to those corporations and establishments that have the biggest vested interests.
They lobby the BMA, the FDA and the Brussels dictocrats in order to get them to suppress any alternative medical view.
And they demand that any natural treatments or remedies are banned from sale in the name of ‘public safety.’.
But, the reality is that, if mainstream medicine really were the science it claims to be, it would have to ditch almost 90 per cent of its drugs and treatments , and declare them unsafe and ineffective…
Don’t believe me?
Well that’s what a research team working in conjunction with the prestigious British Medical Journal has just concluded…
In the latest 2012 Clinical Evidence Handbook, the BMJ researchers looked at 2,500 of the most common drugs and treatments used every day in hospitals and surgeries.
And what they discovered has shaken the whole medical establishment to its very core (although you probably wouldn’t have heard about this in the mainstream media)…
The researchers found that – at best – only 12% of drugs and treatments prescribed by your doctor have been shown in scientific studies to have any benefit for treating illness.
Like me, you’re probably thinking that’s a worryingly low figure.
But, if you think this is bad enough, we’ve barely scratched the surface…
Scandalous Practice #1: Fixing The Figures
A recent damning report by the Scientific-Ethical Committees for Copenhagen and Friedericksberg Municipalities in Denmark found that as many as three quarters of drugs’ studies and trial data published by prestigious medical journals around the world are in fact…
…fabrication and spin…
…concocted – not by doctors – but by ‘ghostwriters’ and PR firms employed by pharmaceutical companies.
Here’s how it works…
When a pharmaceutical company invests tens of millions in the research and development of a new drug, the last thing it wants is for it to flop at the trial stage.
But if a drug trial does flop – as many do – then all is not lost…
The drug company has a few tricks up its sleeve.
It simply re-designs the trial and repeats the process – sometimes as many as six or seven times – until it gets a result that is favourable.
The company then presents the ‘good’ data to the medical journals and to the health regulators . . . (whilst making sure that all the ‘bad’ data about poor performance is destroyed).
The regulators in turn give it their stamp of approval and announce it triumphantly to the world as yet another step forward for medical science.
Kerrrrrrching! Cue the sound of cash registers ringing as all interested parties get paid…
But what the drug company and the regulator conveniently fail to reveal to the public is the data from the other five or six trials, which showed that the drug had flopped.
Now, if a trial demonstrated that a drug was useless , then you would expect the drug company would be under an obligation to publish that information, wouldn’t you?
But – shockingly – no such obligation under law exists for the drug company to make this information available to the public.
Scandalous Practice #2: Fixing The Figures Even More
But, sometimes, no matter how many times you repeat them, drug trials just won’t show what you want them to show.
Even drug company executives admit
Back in 2003, a senior executive with Britain’s biggest drugs company went so far as to admit that most prescription medicines do not work on most people who take them.
Allen Roses, worldwide vice-president of genetics at GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), said fewer than half of the patients prescribed some of the most expensive drugs actually derived any benefit from them.
“The vast majority of drugs – more than 90 per cent – only work in 30 or 50 per cent of the people,” Dr Roses said.
Drugs for Alzheimer’s disease work in fewer than one in three patients, whereas those for cancer are only effective in a quarter of patients. Drugs for migraines, for osteoporosis, and arthritis work in about half the patients, Dr Roses went on to say.
It’s at this point that the drugs companies just give up trying to prove that a drug will do some good.
Instead they bring in specialist PR and marketing firms to re-write and ‘whitewash’ the data in order to present the trial results in a far more favourable light.
And everyone falls for it – hook, line and sinker!
Medical journals publish this whitewashed evidence without ever checking the full study data…
Doctors rely on what’s written by the medical journals to make decisions on which drugs to prescribe us…
And we rely on our doctor to have read all the scientific research so that he’ll prescribe the most effective and the safest drug to cure our health problem.
What this means, in reality, is that when a doctor asks himself these 3 crucial questions before prescribing a drug…
- Does this drug work?
- Does this drug have adverse side effects?
- Will this drug kill patients?
…he has no way of knowing for sure.
And this means he’s putting his patients at risk without realising it.
We saw earlier how researchers reviewing the Clinical Evidence Yearbook found that only 12 per cent of drugs had any evidence to show they work.
Well, if you also exclude the drugs whose data has been manipulated and whitewashed by drug company stooges, then the real number of genuinely useful and effective drugs drops to…
….just 100 out of the 2,500 that are prescribed every day by medical practitioners.
Or to put it another way…
Just 4% of all drugs and treatments will actually do you any good.
Clearly, our whole drug-based system of healthcare – which the medical establishment would have us believe is safe and effective – is so broken and open to abuse that it’s impossible to have any faith in it.
But wait for it! Because here’s the biggest scandal of them all…
In fact, it’s more about what drug companies DON’T do – or more accurately what they DELIBERATELY REFUSE to do – that’s taking such a huge toll in human lives and suffering…
Scandalous Practice #3: Withholding drug safety data
costs hundreds of thousands of lives per year
It’s a fact that thousands of drugs trials never report their results at all.
Some companies even keep the very existence of drug trials a closely guarded secret and deny they’ve ever taken place…
…especially when the drug being trialled is shown to cause serious, or even lethal side-effects, then it’s common practice in the industry to cover it up.
Instead, the drug company simply boxes up the evidence, puts it on a shelf and turns off the light!
But, why is it so important to know this?
Because when a drug company fails to publish ALL the safety data on how a drug has performed, then it’s putting lives at risk…
Hundreds of thousands of lives of lives – as you’ll see from this sad example…
Back in the 1980s, doctors began prescribing anti-arrhythmic drugs on a mass scale to all patients who had suffered a heart attack.
All the published research showed beyond doubt that anti-arrhythmic drugs were very effective for preventing irregular heart patterns…
And because patients who had suffered a heart attack were the most likely to suffer from irregular heart rhythms, it seemed to make perfect sense to prescribe these drugs for ALL heart patients.
However, things went disastrously wrong.
More than 100,000 people were killed as a result of being prescribed these drugs.
You’re probably wondering whether anyone could have foreseen this, especially since the published research had been so positive regarding the benefits?
Well, the simple answer is ‘yes’…
In 1980 a trial of the new anti-arrhythmic drug lorcainide had been conducted on heart attack patients.
Alarm bells started ringing when 19 per cent of the patients taking the new drug died.
The trial was hurriedly stopped.
Lorcainide was dropped for what was described as ‘commercial reasons’.
But these results were NEVER published. (Source: ‘The effect of lorcainide on arrhythmias and survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction: an example of publication bias.’ International Journal of Cardiology: 1993;40(2):161-6))
Just imagine how many lives could have been saved if only this information had been published!
Doctors would have been FAR MORE aware of the potential dangers of these anti-arrhythmic drugs and would have been FAR LESS likely to prescribe them for their patients.
However, if you think this couldn’t happen today – that we’re a lot stricter with the drugs that get approved – then you’re in for a nasty shock, because it’s still happening with many of the drugs most commonly prescribed by your doctor.
Many of these are high profile, blockbuster drugs for tackling cancer, high blood pressure, depression, diabetes, heart disease, dementia… even cholesterol…
They’ve all been approved for use DESPITE the fact that crucial evidence on their effectiveness and safety has been WITHHELD by the drug makers… or else been fabricated by PR professionals.
In 2008, the JUPITER trial, a large scale study of cholesterol-lowering drugs known as statins, produced overwhelmingly positive results, which prompted doctors to go on a prescription frenzy.
They prescribed statins – in particular the statin Crestor (on which the trial was based) – to millions of patients… even healthy ones.
Needless to say, this skyrocketed sales of Crestor and turned the drug into one of the top selling pharmaceutical drugs of all time, earning the manufacturers, AstraZeneca, billions of pounds.
However, two years later, in 2010, a group of doctors and researchers, led by Dr Michel de Lorgeril from France, put their necks on the line and accused the researchers of producing “flawed” trial results and of having commercial interests in Crestor.
It turned out that these accusations were true and, as a result, the JUPITER researchers were forced into a shamefaced admission that the benefits of statins had been grossly exaggerated.
Not only that, but they’d also failed to mention the adverse side effects that had been reported throughout the trial… like increased risk of diabetes, liver failure and dysfunction, kidney failure, depression and muscle damage, to mention just a few.
You may be one of the 7 million patients in the UK who are taking statins because your doctor told you they would benefit your health.
But in reality neither he nor you have the faintest idea whether these drugs will do you any good or whether they will harm you…
And it doesn’t stop there
There are dozens more examples that we’ve unearthed of how drug firms and regulators are withholding information and risking lives.
…The BMJ has been campaigning for greater openness over the flu drug Tamiflu.
The drug was stockpiled by the UK and other governments during the recent flu pandemic, thus making huge profits for the manufacturer, Roche.
But the BMJ – in a joint investigation with the Cochrane Collaboration – found that Roche has consistently failed to hand over data from most of its trials on Tamiflu.
In 2009, Cochrane published a report in the BMJ saying that eight out of the ten randomised controlled trials that Roche used to demonstrate the effectiveness of Tamiflu were never published.
Cochrane researcher Tom Jefferson concluded that the evidence of its benefits – or its safety – could not therefore be relied on.(Source: The Guardian, 31st October 2012))
…According to the US Center for Disease Control, as of June 22, 2011, the FDA’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System received 18,727 reports of adverse events following Gardasil vaccination, given to children to prevent cervical cancer.
A total of 2,799 adverse events were classified as “serious,” including encephalopathy (brain damage). 98 deaths have been reported.
…A recent report in the Wall Street Journal states that more than 15,000 Americans now die annually after accidentally overdosing on prescription painkillers – called opioids – more than from heroin, cocaine and all other illegal drugs combined.
Rising opioid use means that drug overdoses are now the single largest cause of accidental death in America.
… Avandia (rosiglitazone), the diabetes drug, was found to increase the risk of heart attack by 43 per cent in diabetes patients.
Despite knowing about Avandia’s side effects for several years, GSK and the FDA sat on the data, until finally they were forced to concede defeat.
Avandia was removed from the market by regulators in 2011, some eleven years after it was approved.
According to the FDA, more than 100,000 patient heart attacks can be attributed to Avandia, and more than 35,000 deaths.
GSK have so far paid a reported $250 million to the relatives of victims who died as a result… peanuts when you realise that GSK racked up more than $3 billion in sales from Avandia in 2006 alone.
I could go on citing many, many more examples, but I hope you’re beginning to get the picture…
So, let me ask you this question: how do you feel knowing this now?
Pretty mad, I bet.
And, at this point, you’re probably wondering: Who’s in control of all this? What can I do to stop this happening?
Well, there is something you can do and I’ll get to this in just a few moments..
And you’re right – there are government regulators and industry watchdogs who police the activities of the industry.
Surely, they impose their powers, denounce these scandalous practices, dish out hefty fines and make examples of the culprits?
Well, it’s true that the pharmaceutical industry has paid out nearly $15 billion in fines to US government agencies over the last 5 years alone, which is in addition to any payments made as a result of lawsuits taken out by the families of victims.
Their offences have included:
- Illegal off label promotion of drugs ( where a drug licensed for treating one illness is marketed as a treatment for another illness for which no licence has ever been granted)
- Giving financial bribes to doctors and hospitals
- Hiding information on the side effects of their drugs
- Colluding to maintain a monopoly on a drug whose patent has expired
- Tax fraud
But most of these fines have been the result of an industry ‘whistle-blower’ leaking information about corrupt practices to the media.
Practically none of the fines have been the result of the rigorous investigative prowess of the regulators.
Regulators, such as the British Medical Association, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the US, theGeneral Medical Council, the Royal College of General Practice, Surgery and Physicians, The Academy of Medical Sciences, the pharmacists’ organisations and the myriad of other governing bodies have simply sat on their hands and looked the other way.
And it’s only when you dig a little deeper that you find out why…
Most of them are receiving some form of payment or sponsorship from drug companies.
Many of the ‘experts’ who sit on FDA advisory committees are paid consultants for one or another of the drugs companies, whose products they’re supposed to monitor.
For example, four of the six experts on the advisory committee that first approved the controversial arthritis drug – Vioxx – which was estimated to have cost the lives of 60,000 patients – had connections to the pharmaceutical industry.
Vioxx was withdrawn from sale in 2005 when it was found that patients taking this drug quadrupled their risk of heart attack and stroke – a fact that was withheld from the published research.
Merck, its US manufacturer, has ended up paying nearly $6 billion in fines and compensation to the victims’ relatives.
Fortunately, There’s Something You Can Do RIGHT NOW To Stop Yourself Becoming Just Another Medical Statistic…
So, if you can’t trust the industry to tell you the truth about their drugs…
If you can’t rely on your doctor knowing how safe and effective a drug really is…
And, if you can’t trust the regulators to look after your best interests…
…what can you do?
It looks like medicine has reached the end of the road where…
…antibiotics are no longer effective
…vital information on the safety of drugs is being deliberately withheld risking hundreds of thousands of lives each year
…the drugs we do have just don’t work for curing our health problems
…we’re all spending a greater proportion of our lives chronically sick – the average 20 year old woman today will spend 9.8 years without basic mobility.
But it doesn’t have to be like this for you. There’s another path you can take…
Let Our Team of Experts Show You How To Preserve Your Health… And How You Can Avoid Becoming Medicine Dependent